*source in picture*Look at the source of The Chronicle of Guinea. How might this affect the way we read this document? What might be the author's motivation here

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.

president did accomplished his right at presidency, over looked, on in god we trust made a stand point. off being 1 rights as law, 2 as god, for which we stood , under god. off purpose. protected by officially, freedom off and for the people. in god's purposal 15 off each month $500.00 on a single set up off all banks, too closure at 31, 30ths off each asdescression off & compilation eliminates,elimminate, set said.