I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST JUST HELP Investigation Guide

Read the claims recruiters made to convince people to move to the new Minnesota Territory. Write down specific words and phrases used in the primary sources from the Investigation.

I have Primary Source I need Reasons Given to Move to Minnesota

“Emigration up the Mississippi River” advertisement:

“Minnesota! Cure for the Panic” advertisement:

Minnesota and Its Resources guidebook:

Hc! For the West! guidebook:

David W. Humphrey’s letter to friends :

Friedrich Schmitz’s letter to his parents:

Theodore Bost’s letter to his parents:

Guri Sanders-Datter’s letter to friends:

He seventeenth amendment to the us constitution calls for the direct election of all us senators. this means that the people of each state get to vote to decide who will be their two us senators. before this, the legislatures of each state chose the two us senators from that state with no direct involvement of the average voter. why would this amendment be considered a reform? how would it benefit the people? even today some people claim that the seventeenth amendment was a bad idea. what arguments could be made for reverting selection of us senators back to the state legislatures?

How did the theory of social darwinism impact immigrants? it inspired in the immigrants pride that they were able to survive the harsh conditions of their home countries to come to the united states. it demonstrated that immigrants were the most suitable candidates for factory work because they were the most likely to immigrate to rural areas. it encouraged assimilation of immigrants into the american culture through education that involved courses in english and american food and clothing. it provided new american immigrants with a clearly defined social support system to ensure that basic nutritional, educational, employment, and health care needs were met.

How does an appellate court differ from a trial court a. an appellate court usually has a jury b. an appellate court decides issues of facts c. an appellate court examines more witnesses d. an appellate court reviews another courts decision