Which of the following would not have been the job of a poor working-class woman?
A. Maid
B. Typist
C. Seamstress
D. Laundry worker

B. Typist

Explanation:

Typist needed special education which took money to get which also poor people could not get. A maid does not take any education or money to be a poor person could be. A seamstress just took skill instead of money which a poor person could do. A laundry worker you just need to know how to do laundry so a poor person could do it. In conclusion, typist is the most ideal answer. Hope this helps! :))

first second and third

explanation:

rfu jyjdtjydgfnynbfynfy