Describe the diverse views between the two lawyers on the case: Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan. Do you feel that one had a stronger case than the other?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The views between the two lawyers on the case: Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan were completely opposed. Darrow was a famous lawyer with neutral thoughts about religion that had commonsense regarding the natural evolution of men. He was the lawyer that accepted to defend school teacher and football coach John T. Scopes, in a high school in Dayton, Tennesse. On the other hand, the prosecutor, William Jennings Bryan, a conservative Christian American, who had been Secretary of State and candidate to the presidency of the United States.

I feel that Jennings Bryant was so biased by his religious teachings and conservative approaches. Darrow had a stronger more valid case.

britain's king george iii, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may the fundamental grounds upon which americans were taking up arms had shifted. that king george refused to so much as receive the

the court ruled that a state law that banned abortions (except to save the life of the mother) was unconstitutional

hope this : )