In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress A. can establish state banks.

B. has no implied powers.

C. can establish a national bank.

D. has only express powers

C. can establish a national bank.

Explanation:

McCulloch v. Maryland was a litigation or court case between the national bank known as The Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland with respect to the tax that was imposed on it by the state.

Basically, the state of Maryland passed a legislation to impose taxes on bank notes ($15,000 annually) of any bank that is not chartered in the state of Maryland.

However, James W. McCulloch who was head at the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank objected and refused to pay the tax. Consequently, the appellate court of Maryland ruled that the Second Bank was established unconstitutionally because the federal government is not provided a textual commitment by the constitution to charter a bank.

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Marshall ruled that the Federal government of USA has certain implied powers accorded or given to it by the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution but are not explicitly stated therein.

Hence, in McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress can establish a national bank because of its implied powers accorded or given to it by the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States of America.

explanation:

he always remember humbleness for other

he was first president born poor

the answer is: must pay taxes on profits

since it is considered as a part of your income, profits from investments is eligible for tax payment.

the tax from your investment could be influenced by how long you decided to sell it. united states promotes keeping your investment for long term period. so, the tax rate for investments that you sell in less than one year is typically higher compared to investments that you sell in more than one year period.