40 POINTS FOR THIS ITS A BIG THING I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE DONT ANSWER UNLESS YOU’RE ACTUALLY DOING IT!!! I’m really sorry for asking this big assignment of you, but I really don’t have the time to do it...
For the first part, choose either a Chinese merchant, British merchant, Chinese politician, or British politician as your perspective. Basically, you are doing an assignment on why or why not your character might support the opium trade. For the first part make a graphic organizer with notes on each of the following based off who you chose, and also write what source you used to find it.
-historical perspective
-position on the opium trade
-One strong opposing point
-first supporting point
-Second supporting point
-third opposing point

For the second part, I would need you to write an editorial based on the viewpoint of the person you chose. Use the graphic organizer you made to help you write. It should contain the following:
-A few sentences that include the issue
-A sentence or two that clearly identifies your position
-at least one strong point in opposition to your position
-A short bottle of that opposing point
-at least three convincing supporting points for your position
-A concluding sentence or two
-A works-cited list (these should also be cited within the body of your essay using parentheses citations)

The picture I included is the rubric for the editorial!!

Brainliesttt asap!me : ) answer in your own words. what was the relationship between medieval theories about scientific reasoning and the kind of reasoning favored during the scientific revolution?

What two arguments is franklin d. roosevelt making in this excerpt from his "four freedoms" speech? four freedoms by franklin d. roosevelt (excerpt) it is true that prior to 1914 the united states often had been disturbed by events in other continents. we had even engaged in two wars with european nations and in a number of undeclared wars in the west indies, in the mediterranean and in the pacific for the maintenance of american rights and for the principles of peaceful commerce. but in no case had a serious threat been raised against our national safety or our continued independence. what i seek to convey is the historic truth that the united states as a nation has at all times maintained clear, definite opposition, to any attempt to lock us in behind an ancient chinese wall while the procession of civilization went past. today, thinking of our children and of their children, we oppose enforced isolation for ourselves or for any other part of the americas. that determination of ours, extending over all these years, was proved, for example, during the quarter century of wars following the french revolution. while the napoleonic struggles did threaten interests of the united states because of the french foothold in the west indies and in louisiana, and while we engaged in the war of 1812 to vindicate our right to peaceful trade, it is nevertheless clear that neither france nor great britain, nor any other nation, was aiming at domination of the whole world. a) americans should hold on to their isolationist tendencies as long as their own interests are not under threat. b) americans have always fought to uphold human rights and correct injustices against them. c) americans have always been peaceful but should be willing to go to war to defend their allies. d) americans should go to war to protect their allies against the germans and assert their world domination. e) americans should continue to maintain their freedom even in the face of world domination.

The three estates social system in france ensured balanced representation of all people and treated each social group fairly. true or false ? why?