subject
History, 03.12.2020 04:20 sarah8479

The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “use.” Briefly, the case in point was about a man named John Angus Smith who traded a handgun for cocaine. The law under which Smith was charged provided for a much more severe penalty—known as an enhanced penalty—if a gun was used in a drug-related crime than if no gun was involved. (In this case, the enhanced penalty was a mandatory thirty-year sentence; the “unenhanced” penalty was five years.) Justice Antonin Scalia argued that Smith’s penalty should not be enhanced because he did not use the gun in the way that the writers of the law had in mind; he did not use it as a gun. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor argued that the law requires only the use of a gun, not any particular kind of use. If you were a judge, would you vote with Scalia or with O’Connor? Construct an argument in support of your position.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which agency is likely to solve the dispute between susan’s company and the competitor?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Plz ! the election marked the last time the federalist party ran a candidate for president. a. 1812. b. 1820. c. 1816. d. 1824.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
Does anyone know why the second great awakening occurred? (i need an answer asap because this is a question on my assignment! < 3 : ))
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Which of these discoveries contradict components of dalton’s atomic theory?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “us...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.06.2019 13:30
Questions on the website: 13722363