The political party formed to oppose the Constitution was called the Loyalists
Anti-Federalists Party
Federalists

Correct answer is Anti-Federalists Party.

Explanation:

Loyalist is not correct answer, because this was the term that was used for the colonists who were supporting Britain during the Revolutionary war.

Anti-Federalist Party is the correct because this party was opposing the Constitution, in contrast to Federalist Party which was supportive of the Constitution.

Anti-Federalist party

Explanation:

During the debates for the ratification of the new U.S. Constitution (1787), two political parties emerged: First The Federalist party which was led by Alexander Hamilton and other leaders (mainly bankers, northern businessmen, and merchants) that supported the idea of a strong central government and the ratification of the newly proposed Constitution (1787), and secondly, the Anti-Federalist party which was formed to oppose the ratification of the Constitution as well as many other Federalist's ideas.

Overall, the Anti-Federalists, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and consisting mainly of planters, small farmers, and artisans, leaned to give more power to the states and opposed the establishment of a strong government as well as the ratification of the Constitution arguing that it did not contain a Bill of Rights. They believed that without a Bill of Rights that protected people's liberties and put limitations on the government, the latter would eventually abuse its power.

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]

hey depneidng on the rooselvet your talking about theres 2 options either the new deal or the social welfare project hope this