How did the Dred Scott Decision divide the country

In 1846, Dred Scott, a slave living in St. Louis, sued in a Missouri court for his and his family’s freedom

Explanation:

Eleven years later, the case reached the highest federal court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, where the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Scott’s claim to freedom by a vote of 7-2. While the verdict had a personal impact on Scott and his family, it also had legal, political, social, and economic ramifications that reverberated throughout the country in the years immediately preceding the Civil War.

the book of ezekiel takes its title from the priest of the same name, son to a man named buzi. ezekiel’s priestly lineage shines through in his prophetic ministry; he often concerned himself with topics such as the temple, the priesthood, the glory of the lord, and the sacrificial system.

explanation: mark brainliesrt i am trying to get to the next level                                                                                                       i will be your freind and

the catholic church withhold people's access to the bible during the middle ages.

people could go to church and listen to the teachings, but it was absolutely forbidden to own and/or read the books of both the old and new testaments. it was also prohibited to translate the books (which where originally in biblical hebrew) to any other language.

this was done so the church could remain in control of what their teachings were and to enhance their importance and power, while also being able to judge people's actions through information that was unavailable for the general public.