subject
History, 12.12.2020 16:30 penaabel1492

Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?
A. Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not
experience the American Revolution.
B. Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than
making any strong claims.
C. Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about
the American Revolution.
D. Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that
support their arguments.


Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians'

arguments?
A. Neither can

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
The date a source was created is considered part of its historical context intended audience purpose point of view
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
The ottoman kingdom began in the region of anatolia
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:20
How did southern slaveholders attempt to convince people in the north to support slavery?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Why might the spanish government have approved of the encomienda system? a the system allowed for fair treatment of all under it, leading to a happy and prosperous colony. b the system used natives as slaves which meant the government was able to maximize their profit of exported goods. c the system allowed for mostly profitable trade within the different colonies. d the system was a great example of how to successfully run a colony, making spain a world power.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?
A. Neither...
Questions
question
English, 07.07.2019 10:20
question
History, 07.07.2019 10:20
question
History, 07.07.2019 10:20
Questions on the website: 13722360