Both New Hampshire and New York desire more territory for settlers within their states. New land would increase trade, profit and power for their individual states. They claim Vermont territory and appeal to the Articles to settle the dispute. Can the Articles of Confederation solve this problem? Why or why not?

What would lead a historian to consider two events to have a relationship of correlation rather than causation?

Ive been stuck on this question! which of the following statements about the economic consequences of the civil war is not accurate. a. inflation caused prices to rise by 80% in the north. b. because southern farms could not produce enough food for everyone in the south, the union navy allowed food shipments from britain. c. to pay for all of the food, supplies and armaments that were necessary for the union army, congress instituted an income tax. d. business bloomed in the north as factories and farms always had a market for the products.

Match the artists with his technique or to his work. 1 . michelangelo the illusion of depth 2 . giotto perspective and chiaroscuro 3 . raphael "the last supper" 4 . velazquez "sistine madonna" 5 . holbein "david" 6 . masaccio portrait of henry viii 7 . van eyck flemish painter 8 . da vinci spanish painter