Gibbons v. Ogden was mainly about the power of Congress to regulate commerce. issue licenses. defend civil rights. regulate states' rights. It allowed the federal government to issue licenses for commerce between states.

commerce.

Explanation:

Gibbons v. Ogden was a civil case that was decided in 1824. In it, the United States' Supreme Court gave a ruling by ascertaining the tenet that states do not have the jurisdiction granted by legislative enactment to halts or obstructs the United States Congress power to regulate commerce.

Hence, the main point of Gibbons v. Ogden was mainly about the power of Congress to regulate COMMERCE.

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.

i think the answer is: cuba wanted to be independent from spain, and the u.s. wanted to end spanish rule in the west.

hope i

-lavira : )