Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy? A. People tend to vote for the candidates who they find most appealing, rather than the ones whose beliefs are most like their own. B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public. C. Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their positions. D. People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.

explanation:

a primary sousrce was there already born and a secondary sousce is when a soil that has been use is being use again that a secondary

here are some major conflicts i found. maybe pick one and do more research on it. (cause i ain't writing 6 paragraphs)

in 1877, the nez perce war took place.

1881 - president james garfield was assassinated.

1882 - the chinese exclusion act was passed.

1883 - a decision in the civil rights cases legalized racial segregation in the united states.

1887 - the dawes act was passed.

1893 - the panic of 1893 took place. (what a creative name)

and there are probably other topics you can find if you just search up "united states timeline," or "conflicts in the 19th century for america."

then once you find a topic you like find out how it affected the people of america and what not. (sorry if this feels a bit short changed, history was and never will be one of my strong topics)

to act quickly in times of danger to the united states

because you have to act quickly if you want to live/survive.

answer; taking up arms to defend the nation;