PLEASE HELP What is the better approach to civil rights—a peaceful, gradual one that focuses on passing laws and winning cases in court, or a radical one that includes direct action and acts of civil disobedience? Why do you consider this to be the better solution?

a peaceful, gradual one that focuses on passing laws and winning cases in court.

Explanation:

Although the better approach to civil rights depends on the immediate circumstances and therefore must be subjective in nature. I consider a peaceful and gradual process a better one because in modern society, opting for violence is against law. It becomes very difficult to ask for rights and not performing one's responsibility as a member of society. Secondly, peaceful agitation helps you win public support all over the world.

Hope this helps!

deists, human beings can know god only via reason and the observation of nature, but not by revelation or by supernatural manifestations

hope this

i think they would live in caves or natural tunnels