subject
History, 19.12.2020 07:10 ninaaforever

The decision, or holding, in a Supreme Court case sets what is called a precedent. Precedents are treated as laws and they set standards for future cases or legal issues related to the same topic. For example, the holding in Brown v. Board of Education was that segregation in schools violated people’s legally protected equal rights. The precedent set would disallow laws that segregate based on race in schools or in the greater society. Explain the precedent set by Mapp v. Ohio based on the decision summarized above.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Which nation most to bail out greece’s failing economy?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What was the national government’s biggest concern is facing a war under the articles of confederation
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Which of the following people did not run for president in 1848. a. lewis cass. b. zachary taylor. c. martin van buren. d. millard fillmore.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Me! why was marbury v. madison such an important case? a. it confirmed that the supreme court was more powerful than congress but less powerful than the president b. it confirmed the authority of the supreme court to review a law in to determine whether or not that law is constitutional. c. it confirmed the authority of congress to increase or decrease the power of the supreme court. d. it gave the supreme court the power to confirm federal judges.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The decision, or holding, in a Supreme Court case sets what is called a precedent. Precedents are tr...
Questions
question
English, 28.07.2019 00:30
Questions on the website: 13722361