PLEASE HELPPP what was the benefit of using indirect rule in India was opposed to direct rule?

A. indirect rule less likely to face resistance from the Indians
B. indirect made it easier to trade with other European nations
C. indirect rule did not require permission from the British government
D. indirect rule allowed any more freedoms from British colonizers

The correct answer to this question is option A. One benefit of using indirect rule in India is that indirect rule less likely to face resistance from the Indians.

Indirect rule in India was a better type of governance compared to other areas that were under British ruling in the Subcontinent of India.

The areas that were under indirect rule were under the governance of Indian Kings and princes instead of the British crown.

Indirect rule was a type of governance that the British introduced to control some areas under their command.

Read more on link

britain's king george iii, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may the fundamental grounds upon which americans were taking up arms had shifted. that king george refused to so much as receive the

photos creat an ovveral image of the civil war