You rewrote Bradford's Of Plymouth Plantation in your own words. Describe and explain two risks associated with translating words in old texts into current-day wording. Consider using examples. Your response should be at least 150 words long.

There are two methods of interpreting a text: first, you can look at the whole thing, and then you can analyze it to see what the most important ideas and content are. It is precisely word for word. Two states of the user's background are active: 1) when the user is submitting information and 2) when the user is editing information. You are less likely to be able to really interpret the document as you translate it word for word rather than keeping the entire ideas in mind when reading it. Making the term more comprehensible with synonyms easier to identify is a legitimate technique for authors. When you go through the process of translating it from context, you can lose out on key terms that signify importance. The usage of modern vocabulary when transliterating old texts Wording that implies lessens in meaning since each successive era tends to need distinct terms to explain items to be understood. The 'single' capacity of a single term varies from a 'expanded' in many ways' in that it is restricted to just one context and reach, for exampleExplanation:

this forms a narrow, steep sided inlet (sometimes deeper than 1300 metres) connected to the sea. the terminal moraine pushed down the valley by the glacier is left underwater at the fjord’s entrance, causing the water at the neck of the fjord to be shallower than the main body of the fjord behind it.

- a government ruled by the people, or assembly. officials monarchy - a single ruler like a king. over time some city-states, like athens would change governments. what this means is that all the citizens voted on all the laws.