The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the vote to win the vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.

Based on rules and regulations guiding the Electoral College style of voting, the winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the Popular vote to win the Electoral vote.

Also, it makes it possible that a strong third-party candidate could win enough Electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.

The electoral college votes are the votes cast by the Senate and the House of Representatives to determine who becomes the President.

A candidate may win Electoral College votes without winning the Popular sites. The citizens conduct popular votes.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Popular, Electoral, Electoral respectively.

Learn more about the Electoral College Vote here: link

The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.

Explanation:

Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.

.

explanation:

shang dynasty

western zhou (ca. 1046-771 bce)

eastern zhou (ca. 771-256 bce)