In Katz vs United states , the supreme court ruled on whether the police would tap a public phone without a warrant.

Unconstitutional to tap a public phone without a warrant.

Explanation:

In Katz v. United States, 1967, the Supreme Court ruled that The Fourth Amendment protection should bring under its aegis the right to private conversation even electronically. In other words, the court ruled out that it was unconstitutional to wiretap electronic devices without a warrant.

Charles Katz was arrested for interstate gambling in 1965 with evidences from his telephonic conversation from a tapped telephone booth. However, his case became a much debated case on how far does the Fourth Amendment protection apply to.

Based on his case, the Supreme Court concluded that telephone booth becomes a private space when a person enters inside it, therefore it is unconstitutional to wiretap a telephone booth without a warrant.

the correct answer is "c: merchants" and "e. soldiers".

the song dynasty was known as the first government in the world to introduce paper currency. it was also the first chinese government which established a permanent standing navy. finally, the first compass was introduced during this period of government.

all of these innovations heavily affected commerce in a positive way. printed money dynamize commerce within the borders of the empire due to an easier way to quantify value during the trade. the introduction of the compass trade routes to be faster. finally, the introduction of a standing navy regulate trade routes.

regarding military affairs, gunpowder was created during this period. this was a tremendous improvement that was widely utilized by the military in order to innovate in the manufacturing of weapons.