Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier dissenting opinion: The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital, mandate to [teach] moral and political values is not a general warrant to act as "thought police" stifling discussion of all but state-approved topics. . . . Official censorship of student speech on the ground that it addresses "potentially sensitive topics" is . . . impermissible.4 The reasoning in this opinion is most similar to the reasoning in which other Supreme Court ruling? A. New Jersey v. T. L.O. B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Gideon v. Wainwright D. Tinker v. Des Moines