Nthe 1600s, why didn’t the king of england always know what was happening in the american colonies? the king was not very interested in the american colonies. the colonies governed themselves, so he did not need to know. the colonies were far away, and it took a long time for news to reach him. the king did not appoint the colonial governors, so no one reported to him.
Answers: 2
Another question on History
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
When leaders use religious laws to govern, they most likey represent? a democracy, an autocratic you, a monarchy, a theocracy
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
Which action by the us war department angered chief red cloud to the point that he refused to sign the treaty of fort laramie ? a) the killing of buffalo by the united states troops b) the appointment of troops to the powder river basin c) the burning of parts of the powder river basin d) the murder of chief red cloud’s wife
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
Popular sovereignty is the principle that governmental authority is derived from the people. under this principle, government governs with the consent of the governed. explain this concept in your own words. is this principle important to you? why or why not?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 10:20
What significance does alfred t. mahan have on expansion and imperial policies of the late 1800s?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Nthe 1600s, why didn’t the king of england always know what was happening in the american colonies?...
Questions
Social Studies, 13.04.2021 21:50
Biology, 13.04.2021 21:50
History, 13.04.2021 21:50
Mathematics, 13.04.2021 21:50
Mathematics, 13.04.2021 21:50
Spanish, 13.04.2021 21:50
Mathematics, 13.04.2021 21:50
Biology, 13.04.2021 21:50
English, 13.04.2021 21:50
Chemistry, 13.04.2021 21:50
