In 750 word essay, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a compromise such as the Missouri compromise. Decide whether compromise are necessary in a democratic republic. Explain the reasons for your opinion. Can some one help me ASAP
please I need to turn it in.

⬇️

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise was United States federal legislation that supported northern attempts to forever prohibit slavery’s expansion. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820, admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. But, what were the advantages and disadvantages of the Missouri Compromise?

    Firstly let’s take a look at some of the advantages. Some advantages of the Missouri Compromise included that the Civil War was put off for a little while, and a boundary was made, which helped relieve some of the tension between the North and the South. A boundary was finally set which stopped the spread of slavery past a certain point. This made the North happy, and the South got to keep Missouri. According to experts, “The compromise helped keep the power.” This means that the compromise helped balance power in the government. This was essential to keep war from breaking out. And slavery would not be permitted. 

    Another factor to consider is the disadvantages. Some disadvantages of the Missouri Compromise include the arguments and debates held after it was made. According to “History” article, “The south kept arguing that the federal government had no right to decide what the states could and could not do.” This means that these debates created tension, and states then began debating whether or not they could secede to the Compromise. 

    In my opinion, I think Compromises are necessary for a democratic republic because it helps people. Suppose that you’re working with a ton of people, in order for people to work together when they disagree, they might have to compromise. This can avoid conflict and accomplish things. In democracy, compromise can help to make a deal between different parties.

    To sum up, everything that’s been stated so far, The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a major pre-civil war conflict, that determinated what states could have slaves and radically shifted power between the North and South. in an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. In Henry Clay’s Missouri Compromise, Missouri was to be admitted as a slave state and Maine was to be admitted as a free state. This was to maintain the balance of the North and South. Slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri. The south felt that the U.S. government had no power under the Constitution, and the compromise helped to divide a line between the enslaved and free states as the country continued to expand and the compromise was successful. 

ok so i only know that

pirlalta-2

kino-4

serra-7

menedez-1

coronado-5

but just a heads up if you need on things like this you can make an account for quiz-let and it will give you the answers ur looking for.

joseph stalin's cult of personality became a prominent part of soviet culture in december 1929, after a lavish celebration for stalin's 50th birthday.[answer:

explanation: