Which statement best summarizes the ruling of the
Connecticut Supreme Court

So, I just took a test with this exact question. For me, the options were:

The property could not be considered for public use.

The property could be seized only if the city could prove the community would benefit.

The government had the right to seize the property for virtually any public use.

The government did not have the right to condemn the property.

Is it the same for you?

The answer to mine was:

C: The government had the right to seize the property for virtually any public use

I hope this helps!!

question 1: a) thurgood marshall

question 2: b) the civil rights act of 1964

question 3: c) brown v board of education

question 4: d) creation of the dept of education

question 5: a) welfare and social security

explanation:

the main concern with the first draft of the articles of confederation was too much power in the state governments.