subject
History, 19.01.2021 07:30 reebz62

"Alexander made a reconnaissance in person of the enemy's strength and dispositions and, despite the Jeagerness of most of his generals, he decided against a night attack. Instead, he retired to his tent to
devise his strategy. He ordered his troops to be well fed and then to rest. Darius, on the other hand,
mindful of Alexander's unpredictable manoeuvres, ordered his army to stand to throughout the night in
readiness for a surprise attack. It is certain that the alertness of one side and the fatigue of the other
played at least some part in the outcome of the battle next day."
-Anthony Livesey,
Great Commanders and Their Battles
The last sentence of the passage hints of what outcome?
a. There is no battle.
C. Alexander wins the battle.
b. Darius wins the battle.
d. They fight, but neither side wins.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
What lured the spanish to the area of oklahoma?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Which british law required americans to house and feed british troops? sugar and molasses actstamp actnavigation actsquartering act
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
What new concept did the the american revolution introduce into the world
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How does wards description of the roman government compare to polybius description in sorce 1 and millars description in source 2
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
"Alexander made a reconnaissance in person of the enemy's strength and dispositions and, despite the...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 27.05.2021 01:00
question
English, 27.05.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722361