Whose approach to running an empire do you most appreciate: that of the Assyrians or the Persians? please put two answers for brainliest

I would say neither, both were equally cruel and not agreeable, but here goes nothing...

If your wanted answer is the Assyrians here you go :

I would appreciate the Assyrians for running an empire the most for their highly organized government for controlling captured lands can keep any conspirators from seizing the land back. And by cruelly capturing peoples, the enemy would know not to mess with ( us ) and we would build our empire further!

If your wanted answer is the Persians :

Their absolute monarchy can keep the king all in control. We can make request and no one could oppose if the king agrees. No coup can happen since it's an absolute monarchy and when the king sentences them to death, they die. We could grow our economy steadily with Persian empire running.

( Seriously it hard for me to write anything for the Persians... but yep )

these acts divided the south into five military districts.

was a long, primarily nonviolent series of events to bring full civil rights and equality under the law to all americans. the era has had a lasting impact on united states society, in its tactics, the increased social and legal acceptance of civil rights, and in its exposure of the prevalence and cost of racism. in the south violence and fraud in southern elections from 1868 to 1876, which had reduced black voter turnout and enabled southern white democrats to regain power in state legislatures across the south