ANSWER ASAP I GIVE BRAINLIEST Constitutional process by which a president appoints a member of the cabinet or a justice of the U. S. Supreme Court, and evaluating the principle(s) of government behind that process

The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American  politics. Each appointment is of consequence because of the enormous judicial power the  Supreme Court exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Appointments are  usually infrequent, as a vacancy on the nine-member Court may occur only once or twice, or  never at all, during a particular President’s years in office. Under the Constitution, Justices on the  Supreme Court receive what can amount to lifetime appointments which, by constitutional  design, helps ensure the Court’s independence from the President and Congress.  

The procedure for appointing a Justice is provided for by the Constitution in only a few words.  The “Appointments Clause” (Article II, Section 2, clause 2) states that the President “shall  nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the  supreme Court.” The process of appointing Justices has undergone changes over two centuries,  but its most basic feature—the sharing of power between the President and Senate—has remained  unchanged: To receive appointment to the Court, a candidate must first be nominated by the  President and then confirmed by the Senate.

Explanation:

A President has no power to remove a Supreme Court Justice from office. A Justice may be  removed by Congress, but only through the process of impeachment by the House and conviction  by the Senate. Only one Justice has ever been impeached (which occurred in 1804),  and he remained in office after being acquitted by the Senate. Many Justices serve for 20 to 30  years and sometimes are still on the Court decades after the President who nominated them has  left office.