subject
History, 27.01.2021 22:00 fatlenny

Whenever archaeologists excavate a site, they use primary and secondary sources to learn about that site and its artifacts. Are these research methods enough to give complete information about the discovered site or artifact? What other methods do you suggest to help uncover more information about the archaeological find? Do you think that information gained from oral history is helpful or misleading while concluding an archaeological find?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
Which of the following was a result of the reconstruction act of 1867? check all of the boxes that apply.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:50
Which of the following scenarios illustrates the cultural impact of expanded regional trade for postclassical civilizations? o a. the byzantine empire rises in place of the roman empire. o b. an islamic scholar attends a university in his hometown. o c. internal disputes weaken a large african empire. o d. an arabian sultan wears a robe made from chinese silk.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
The final solution was nazi germany’s plan to
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:50
Which were lenin’s actions before and during the russian revolution
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Whenever archaeologists excavate a site, they use primary and secondary sources to learn about that...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.04.2020 23:59
question
Social Studies, 08.04.2020 23:59
Questions on the website: 13722361