History, 05.02.2020 11:53 paulinahunl17

How did the supreme court decision in worcester v. georgia and the indian removal act lead to the removal and resettlement of native american groups?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

On May 28, 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed a law giving the right to negotiate to Native American to leave the east side of Mississippi river. Their resettlement was voluntary. However, when President Andrew Jackson had a victorious landslide election in 1832, the tribal groups was forced to withdraw and relocate.

Hope this helps! Have a nice day.

Answer from: jdvazquez18p7a7vs

On 28 May 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian removal act giving the reference of Worcester v. Georgia that granted negotiation of Native Americans to banish from the Eastern side of the Mississippi River. Though the resettlement was voluntary, but helped Jackson to have a victorious landslide election of 1832.

Further Explanation:

In 1832, Worcester V Georgia neglected the judgment of “Samuel Worcester” by Supreme Court. It detained the Georgia criminal case which forbidden non-Native Americans to reside on Americans' native land without license. It was non-constitutional.

Worcester was the protector of the Cherokee's sovereignty, and translator of Bible, and a “missionary” to Cherokee. Worcester made an alliance with “Elias Boudinot” to institute the Cherokee Phoenix, first American newspaper in regional language.

European American settlers’ migration from coastal areas to “Cherokee territory” after making “land cessions” to the United States’ government became prevailing. Worchester and his supporters planned to fight against the infringement through the court.

Learn More:

in Furman v. Georgia (1972), the supreme court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had Though the outcomes of the Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

Answer Details:

Grade: Middle School

Chapter: Worcester versus Georgia

Subject: History

Keywords: negotiation, Worcester V. Georgia, victorious, Supreme Court, sovereignty, translator, migration, Cherokee territory

Answer from: Quest

the correct answer is "cut spending on social programs."good luck

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

consider an orange peel: if you want to try and lay it flat, you have to stretch it, we know exactly how things are being stretched or squashed at any given point. we have many different map projections because each has different patterns of some projections can even preserve certain features of the earth without

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 19:00

How did the british show bad leadership during the battle of the somme

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 20:00

The southern states were unhappy with reconstruction. they saw it as punishment by the_? . they were also against_? 2_ , as shown by the black codes. ? 1 ? 2 radical republicans providing equal rights to men and women democrats providing blacks the right to vote moderate republicans providing women us citizen ship

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:00

Which is the main inference that can be drawn from adam smith's book the wealth of nations? a) for an economy to work flawlessly, it shouldn't have to serve and moral goals.b) the government must control a free-market economy, or economic problems will arise.c) a free-market economy works well only without the government's interference. d) free trade will only hurt economies and should be stopped by governments.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:50

Between 1870 and 1916, approximately how many immigrants came to the united states? 10 million 25 million 75 million 125 million

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

How did the supreme court decision in worcester v. georgia and the indian removal act lead to the re...

Questions