how does interpretation b differ from interpretation a about Martin Luther king and the civil rights?

Interpretaion B seems more cynical of all that Martin Luther King actually did.

Explanation:

In Interpretation B, he states, "Without King, the civil rights campaign would still have happened." This seems to be implying that, unlike Interpretation A, he does not agree that MLK was as much of a fuss as we make him otu to be. Where-as, Interpretation A highly praises MLK, stating, "Martin Luther was an inspiration to our nation."

Hope this helps!

you are very ugly bro

explanation:

d. protection of an individual’s rights regardless of sex

b. acknowledgment of an individual’s rights regardless of sex

c. inclusion of individuals in the us congress regardless of sex