The idea that a king is subject to no earthly authority, getting his right to rule directly from the will of God and does not have to answer to anyone
and thus can do no wrong.
a. Divine Right of Kings
b. Glorious Revolution
d. Petition of Right
c. Mandate of Heaven

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

the governor can not veto a referendum that the voters approve

bipartisan basally means two groups of people who dont agree with each other (republican and democrat) make an agreement or work with each other