Why is it important to interview people who actually lived through historic events to better understand those historical events?

Too get what is called an eye witness view or perspective. for example, when you ask a reporter or read an article about a historical event, you will only get answers from information read up about. While if you were too ask someone who actually lived through it they would know almost all the small facts or details that the reporter would know. That’s why it is important, as they were actually there too see the event, Hence eye witness.

It is important because primary sources such as eyewitnesses offer firsthand accounts and details other sources might not give you. Interviews with people who lived through historic events often capture the tone and impact of what it was like to be there. The media can sometimes mince information and drive false narratives for the sake of sensationalism. By going directly to the source you can get information about a historical event while also getting insight into the impact it had on people.

Explanation:

the graph shows the spread of railways in the 1800s.

based on the graph, the conclusion that can be drawn about germany is answer d)   by 1880, germany had more rail lines than great britain and russia.

no every country is held to the same degree as others just some member countries such as the usa and germany are more economically sound so the need to show there support to all others