Should presidents be permitted to make signing statements, giving their interpretation of the law, when it's Congress's job to make law? Why or Why Not?

The president can issue his own interpretations of a given law through a signed document. This can be done, because the constitution allows him to have this privilege, to leave the powerful executive branch within the government.

Explanation:

The law-making function is not exclusively the responsibility of the national congress, although the congress is primarily responsible for this. The power to make laws belongs to the congressman and the head of the executive branch, who is the president of the republic. In that case, if the preceding person does not agree with a specific law created, he can issue a document with the reasons why he believes that this law should not be sanctioned.

This power is guaranteed by the federal constitution, as a way of allowing the executive branch to oversee the legislative branch.

c

the articles of confederation placed most of the power on the feds

answer: wait what

explanation: