Promise it's easy points Write a five paragraph essay comparing and contrasting another instance of genocide to the Nazi Holocaust to Pol Pot in Cambodia: 1975-1979

Introduction

The field of comparative genocide studies has grown beyond recognition over

the past two decades, though more quantitatively than qualitatively. On the

surface, everything looks good: the number of books on genocide has tripled

within less than a decade; the field of comparative genocide studies has its

own professional association and journals; more and more colleges and universities offer courses on genocide; several research institutions dedicated to

the study of genocide have been established. If we are talking numbers, comparative genocide studies are indeed a great success. Upon close examination,

however, genocide scholarship is ridden with contradictions. There is barely

any other field of study that enjoys so little consensus on defining principles

such as definition of genocide, typology, application of a comparative

method, and timeframe. Considering that scholars have always put stress on

prevention of genocide, comparative genocide studies have been a failure.

Paradoxically, nobody has attempted so far to assess the field of comparative

genocide studies as a whole. This is one of the reasons why those who define

themselves as genocide scholars have not been able to detect the situation of

crisis. This article looks at the conceptual and institutional development of

comparative genocide scholarship and outlines major problems that its practitioners face.

Comparative genocide scholarship is still in its infancy. With the exception of two studies that appeared in 1959 and 1972,1 the scholarly community came Holocaust versus genocide studies

The field of comparative genocide studies was born into the opposition to the

dominant Holocaust discourse.3 What may be seen as an act of revolt has

largely informed the subsequent development of the field and its unduly militant character. Some scholars, who tend to pose as unofficial spokesmen for

genocide studies, have been attacking the Holocaust establishment ever since.

The harshest critic proved to be Henry Huttenbach, who has taken on the U.S.

Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) and the historians associated with it

in the newsletter that he established in 1994. Thus, he called USHMM ‘the Great  

to appreciate the work of Raphael Lemkin only in the late 1970s. Another

15–20 years passed before the name of Lemkin acquired its rightful place

among the leading humanists of the twentieth century.2 Until well into the

mid 1990s, the discourse on comparative genocide was largely limited geographically to North America. In Europe, in Germany in particular, ‘genocide’

has long been used as a synonym for the word ‘Holocaust’.

c

explanation: