In addition to this, the South] sent to the North $30,000,000 worth of cotton, which is not counted in the exports. We sent to her $7 or $8,000,000 worth of tobacco, which is
not counted in the exports. We sent naval stores, lumber, rice, and many other minor
articles. There is no doubt that we sent to the North $40,000,000 in addition, but suppose
the amount to be $35,000,000, it will give us a surplus production of $220,000,000. But
the recorded exports of the South now are greater than the whole exports of the United
States in any year before 1856. They are greater than the whole average exports of the
United States for the last twelve years, including the two extraordinary years of 1856 and
1857. They are nearly double the amount of the average exports of the twelve preceding
years. If I am right in my calculations as to $220,000,000 of surplus produce there is not a
nation on the face of the earth, with any numerous population, that can compete with us
in produce per capita
-- South Carolina Senator Hammond's Speech to Congress Regarding Kansas - 3/4/1848
PROMPT. Based on the selection, how does the Northern economy rely on the slave labor of the South?
Use evidence only from the text to support your response.

hr2520 is the patient's act. there is required the secretary of health to summon a committee to develop a national strategic plan of prevention. this committee has forth provisions that make possible for the govern entities to acquire private health insurance services.

is easier to keep this hr2520 as federal, because that way the secretary of health has centralized power to deal with private insurance companies and the federas government has more ways and power to negotiate with them, than doing this process state by state in their specific terms.

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”

the intolerable acts- d