subject
History, 08.02.2021 22:30 lilyforeman5867

Andrew Jackson became the nation’s seventh president in 1828. He was—and still is—one of the country’s most controversial presidents. To his supporters, he was a war hero and a true man of the people. His presidency helped to make the United States more democratic. He challenged powerful elites and drove the expansion of the United States westward. But his critics charged that Jacksonian democracy benefited only his supporters. To beat his rivals, he was ruthless. He waged campaigns to remove Native Americans from their homes and limited the rights of African Americans.

Jackson’s career forces us to ask: What values do Americans hold dear? Did Jackson take the country in the right direction or the wrong one?

Democracy in America
The Declaration of Independence states that the government’s role is to secure the rights of the people: “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Democracy, however, was not included among these rights. Many founders, such as Alexander Hamilton, did not believe democracy was necessarily a good thing. They feared that too much democracy would lead to tyranny—not from a king, but from the masses of ordinary people.

These founders wanted democracy, but not democracy as we think of it today. Yes, the founders wanted “the people” to elect their own representatives, but what they meant by “the people” was very limited. In early America, “the people” referred to a small group: white men who owned property.

North Carolina Emigrants: Poor White Folks. Source: Wikimedia Commons, James Henry Beard, Cincinnati Art Museum
White Americans who did not own land, however, wanted more democracy. They used what rights they had to vote in large numbers and participate in public demonstrations. As the nation’s population grew, so did this thirst for democracy. Political leaders of the time could not hold back the building desire for real democracy. More and more people wanted to be able to vote and have politicians listen to their concerns. This was especially true in the new states and territories in the west.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
How does an oligarchy conflict with democratic principles
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Why did the federal government choose to give each tribal member a 25-year deed to the reservation land? this was the life expectancy of native americans at this time, and the government wished to grant rights for only a single generation. they considered this to be enough time to keep the area calm before they could take the land back again for sale. the united states government believed that the nutrients from the land would be depleted by the end of the deed. the government believed this would be enough time for the tribal members to become self-reliant and adapt to the farming lifestyle.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
What happened as a result of the colonial victory at saratoga
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Why did the other allies like great britain and france not support wilsons 14 points?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Andrew Jackson became the nation’s seventh president in 1828. He was—and still is—one of the country...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 16.06.2021 03:00
question
Chemistry, 16.06.2021 03:00
Questions on the website: 13722361