subject
History, 09.02.2021 19:30 gedntrxAa

The excerpt below was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the decision of Schenck v. United States (1919). The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shounting fire in a theatre and causing a panic The question in everycase is whether the words used are used in such curcumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that congress has a right to prevent.

Which conduct did the U. S Supreme Court determine was a “clear and present danger” in this case?

demonstrations in which protestors burned American flags

newspaper articles criticizing U. S. entry into the war

the presence of Japanese Americans on the West Coast

the mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Select the correct answer. what are concurrent powers? a. powers granted solely to state governments b. powers granted to the national government c. powers transferred between government leaders d.powers shared between national and state governments
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
Who were the “rough riders”? a. cuban revolutionaries who battled the spanish for independence b. a volunteer cavalry unit in the spanish-american war c. spanish generals in cuba who mistreated the civilian population d. newspaper owners who influenced public opinion by exaggerating the truth
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
The united states and the world! apex what is globalization?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which principle means that government is bound by the rule of law
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The excerpt below was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the decision of Schenck v. United...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362