subject
History, 10.02.2021 02:00 andrespeerman

I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and indeed with a feeling that we could achieve some of our objectives simply by having some men there who would participate in limited kinds of activity, but in the case of Korea told not to win, and in the case of Vietnam clearly without the intention of applying the degree of force necessary to win. That's a very terrible thing to do to military people – to ask them to go into extreme danger, but in effect to have a decision made that it's not important enough for us to win. —Caspar Weinberger,
Secretary of defense in Reagan administration,
1987

What reason does Weinberger give for the United States losing the war?

The United States had never fought in a jungle setting before.
The United States’ troops were not strong enough to fight.
The United States entered the war without a real commitment to the conflict.
The United States should have followed the same approach as in the Korean War.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
During the 1960s, how did the neural movement promote the chicano movement
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
Which areas where seperated by the iron curtain
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Which of the following wrote detailed accounts about early native american? a) spanish b) french c) americans d) mexicansi need this !
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Why is the sons of liberty a difficult group to describe ?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and inde...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 10.09.2021 01:00
question
History, 10.09.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722362