subject
History, 10.02.2021 20:20 dianaaivanov

Discussion Questions Opinion: The Mobbing of a Portland Bookstore Reminds Us Why FAHRENHEIT 451 Was Written
1. Define censorship, dystopian, fascism
2. The label ‘fascist’ gets used a lot these days. How well can you articulate what a
fascist truly believes? What, for example, did the Nazis stand for? How did they
maintain control of the German state?
3. Why do people try to ban books?
4. Consider this phrase again: “his work is too dangerous to be allowed to be aired.”
What is your reaction to that idea?
5. Who decides what’s dangerous?
6. Where else have you seen free speech suppressed lately?
7. How well does the novel Mr. Polumbo discusses match what’s happening in
Portland? In other words, do you find his argument effective, or not? Why?
8. What books have you read that wrestle with the dangers of suppressing
unpopular speech?
9. How is reading books different from reading social media posts or news articles,
or even columns like this one?
10. What can books do that these other reading materials cannot?
11. Why do you think the bookstore owner removed Ngo’s book from his shelves
while keeping it in the online catalogue? Was he right to do so? Explain.
12. If you were the bookstore owner, what would you do? Why?
13. Do you think that truth can eventually be found if all ideas are able to be freely
expressed? Can truth be found if some ideas are not given the possibility of
consideration?
14. Should these protesters face consequences for their efforts to manipulate this
bookstore? Why or why not? If so, what consequences would be appropriate?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which statement best completes the diagram related to the supreme court’s procedures? a. a party in a lower-court case requests that the supreme court overturn the other court’s ruling in the case. b. federal judges nominate a small number of cases to be overturned by the supreme court. c. congress votes on which court cases should be reviewed by the supreme court. d. the president selects court cases involving new laws for the supreme court to review
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Iam told that hundreds if not thousands of these (armenians) were sent at once to the front ranks at the dardanelles, where death in a very short space of time is almost a certainty. the older men were then deported into the interior, while the women and children, when not carried off in an opposite direction, were left to shift for themselves as best they could. the terrible feature of this deportation up to date is that it has been carried out on such a basis as to render it practically impossible in thousands of cases that these families can ever again be reunited. not only wives and husbands, brothers and sisters, but even mothers and their little children have been dispersed in such a manner as to preclude practically all hope that they will ever see each other again. according to this excerpt, what does the author consider to be the worst part of the deportation during the armenian genocide?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
What tactic did palestinians use against israel in 1987
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Ineed a example for this test plz reflect on your decisions in the cases of hazelwood v. kuhlmeier and t.m. v. state of florida using the following questions: did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case? did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights for each case? what factors most influenced your decision and interpretations in each cas
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Discussion Questions Opinion: The Mobbing of a Portland Bookstore Reminds Us Why FAHRENHEIT 451 Was...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367