Why are primary sources important when studying historical events? O A. because they are a direct link to the events in history OB. because we would know very little about major historical events without these sources OC. because primary sources are the only way we can learn about the culture of a civilization OD. because secondary sources are not reliable enough and can't be trusted​

it is

a

asked for and recieved from the united states

what are the options mate?

explanation:

not to be rude or anything but, nobody can really answer that if you don't add the options sorry if it came of rude uwu

the anwer to

this question is false the spnaish had more than enough reinforcments and soldiders to defeat the azatecs becuase the azatecs did not have the advanced technolgy the spanish did

i would need the graph to answer the question