The Article states: Since then, Holocaust survivors and human rights groups have fought the kind
of hateful beliefs that made the Holocaust possible. And they point out
concerning signs today. Those signs include anger toward immigrants, acts of
racism, and bullying. They also warn about the failure of many to oppose
injustice.
The author's purpose for writing this passage was to
A show why responsibility for the Holocaust went beyond those in Nazi uniform
B
prove that hateful beliefs do not spread as easily as they used to
C show why people should continue to confront hate so it doesn't spread
D prove that many people in Germany did nothing to stop the Nazis

I think D

Explanation:

assuming that you are talking about the one in egypt: hecka oil

explanation:

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!