Historians and economists today, are in constant debate regarding the effectiveness of Roosevelt’s New Deal. While some argue that FDR exploited his power, and went too far in addressing the economic crisis, others argue that his efforts successfully brought us out of the Depression. Consider all of the documents that you analyzed with your group members and use evidence from those documents to explain in at least 5-6 sentences how effective or ineffective the New Deal was in your opinion. We all have different ideas of what constitutes as “effective” or “ineffective", and you will most likely have a different response compared to the rest of your group members.  Help me pls this is for today

“the battle of stalingrad is not a turning point necessarily in strategic terms, because a lot more has to be done before the soviets can be certain of defeating germany,” says renowned world war ii historian richard overy. the germans had fought nearly a thousand miles across the soviet union to get to stalingrad.

question 1: a) thurgood marshall

question 2: b) the civil rights act of 1964

question 3: c) brown v board of education

question 4: d) creation of the dept of education

question 5: a) welfare and social security

explanation:

interest groups send representatives to state capitals and to washington, d.c. to put pressure on members of congress and other policymakers. they engage in lobbying, or the organized process of influencing legislation or policy. lobbying can take many forms. interest groups can testify in congressional hearings.