Mali Let me tell you why salt is a symbol of wealth in our county, in our country
salt was historically and very difficult to get a hold of, due to lack of production and
þeing expensive to buy! Many restrictions were placed on creation. Since salt was
abundant in the north of Mali, but scarce in the south, they would have to import it. Salt
was mainly used to preserve foods, like meat, but also corpses, and etc. Malians would
also need salt in their food, since they wouldn't normally have much in their diet. Salt is
more valuable to us than gold because the Akan lived in the forest of west africa, they
had few natural resources for salt and always needed to trade for it. Gold however, was
much more easier to come by. The people who lived in the desert of North Africa could
easily mine salt, but not gold. Our empire is the largest in west africa, and profoundly
influenced the culture of the region though the spread of its language, laws, and
consisting of numerous vassal kingdoms and provinces. Our country experiences an
extreme dry season followed by some rainy days, more rain goes to the south weather
in the north. North will typically be more consistent throughout the year, but more humid
in the summer months. The dry season
occurs between november and may, and most
precipitation occurs from july to September

does this sound like it’s in first person? i’m not good at this so if i need to fix anything can you help me plz help

i am not 100% positive but i think it is is b. both are non-partisan jobs

i am pretty sure that members of congress have term limits, can be impeached, and are nominated through direct popular vote.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

i think 3 documents.

hope i

-lavira: )