subject
History, 26.02.2021 01:00 jpruitt10

In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took him into linois, a free state, and then to Wisconsin, a free teritory, and then back to Missouri. Scott was suing for his freedom based on what grounds ? A. This lawsuit was after the Emancipation Proclamation, and slavery was illegal. B. Based on popular sovereignty, Missouri was to become a free state the next year C. He had been a slave for 10 years; therefore, by law he should have been freed. D. He felit his residence in the free areas had made him a free man.​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
After the 9/11 attacks, the united states launched a military offensive against the taliban government in a) iraq b) egypt c) afghanistan d) kuwait
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
What is different about the way a live television news program presents information versus a memoir about the same event?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:00
Britan saw its colonists as a soucre of
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:00
Which statement best explains this excerpt from plaths mirror
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took hi...
Questions
question
Geography, 13.10.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2020 05:01
Questions on the website: 13722361