Do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion?
• A. In the dissent, the majority opinion itself is used as evidence.
• B. The dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support.
•C. Notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's
argument.
• D. The arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized.

you are the imposter

Explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

it made them more prductive and efficent but with the change of polcies less and les got into the navy