How did the Union’s three part strategy impact Texas?

1.Fully blockade all  Southern coasts. This strategy, known as the ANACONDA PLAN, would eliminate the possibility of Confederate help from abroad.

2.Control the Mississippi River. The river was the South's major inland waterway. Also, Northern control of the rivers would separate Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas from the other Confederate states.

3.Capture RICHMOND. Without its capital, the Confederacy's command lines would be disrupted.

4.Shatter Southern civilian morale by capturing and destroying ATLANTA, SAVANNAH, and the heart of Southern secession, South Carolina.

5.Use the numerical advantage of Northern troops to engage the enemy everywhere to break the spirits of the Confederate Army.

Explanation:

A few extra explanations! Hope I helped :)

Finally, the relative influence of various sectors of the US government apparatus on inter-American relations has changed greatly since the 1970s. The State Department, the Pentagon, and the CIA are no longer the only - or the main - government agencies relevant to the region, as they were between the 50s and 80s. For many Latin American countries, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and the person in charge of the area of ​​Commerce are more important than the Secretary of State. The governors of California, Texas and Florida are more significant to certain issues or countries than some officials in Washington, as is evident in the current debate on immigration policy. Certainly, the heads of Homeland Security and the United States Anti-Drug Agency (DEA), officials of the Department of Agriculture and members of the Federal Judiciary have more impact than the Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs.

answer: a parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. in a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. this is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as the united kingdom, denmark, sweden, and japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president is the head of state while the head of government is regularly from the legislature (such as ireland, germany, india, and italy). in a few parliamentary republics, such as botswana, south africa, and suriname, among some others, the head of government is also head of state, but is elected by and is answerable to parliament. in bicameral parliaments, the head of government is generally, though not always, a member of the lower house.

parliamentarianism is the dominant form of government in europe, with 32 of its 50 sovereign states being parliamentarian. it is also common in the caribbean, being the form of government of 10 of its 13 island states, and in oceania. elsewhere in the world, parliamentary countries are less common, but they are distributed through all continents, most often in former colonies of the british empire that subscribe to a particular brand of parliamentarianism known as the westminster system.

explanation:

answer: not really

explanation: the disadvantages of wikipedia are:

the advantages of wikipedia are