6.

What was Frank Crow's attitude toward building the dam? To what problems did this lead?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached or further references, we can say the following.

Frank Crow's attitude toward building the dam was decisive. He was determined to build and end Hoover Dam at all costs. The problem did this lead was that he had many inexperienced workers and limited time to built the gigantic project. This produces many challenges and problems to the degree that he faced some worker's protests and the threat of going on strike. Workers were against a pay cut and also demanded better working conditions under that risky endeavor.

Workers indeed went on strike but Frank Crowe firmly stood and resisted the strike. He was supported by his contractors and he placed an ultimatum for workers to get back to work or leave the construction definitely.

Everybody knows how the story ended. People said that Crowe was a firm leader that knew how to manage problems and convince his workers to finish the challenging project.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.

cultural history is your answer