How can this document be used to argue that Alexander's legacy extended from Italy to India? Explain, using two specific examples.

Looking at the above document, we can tell that Alexander's legacy extended to India because the religion that was most directly influenced by Greek art and ritual is Buddhism in India. Alexander was responsible for conquering the Persian empire all the way to India so if the Greeks are influencing anything in India - as they are Buddhism - this is a legacy of Alexander.

We can also see from the above that his influence extended to Italy as well because the Roman emperor, Marcus Macrinus had images of Alexander the Great sewn into his clothing. Italy was the seat of power for the Roman empire so for Alexander to have been depicted by a Roman emperor, his legacy must have extended to Italy.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

the answer is aggresion hope this and mark me as brainiest and add me as friend