In your own words, how would you define 20th-century progressivism? How does it inform 21st-century progressivism/liberalism?

What does the case of mary dyer in 1660 illustrate? a. puritans practiced a fierce rhetoric but were lenient in practice. b. quakers had a tenuous grasp on the social realities of the english colonies. c. quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense. d. quakers practiced their religion without a church and without clergy.

Why must governments be able to compromise?

Which of the following would be of greatest concern to a speaker in presenting to children? choose only two. 1. age 2. expectation 3. ethnicity 4. knowledge 5. gender