Can someone help me with this please ASAP quickly. questions:

In 1-2 sentences each, explain the two narratives (stories) about Hiroshima

Which narrative do you agree with more? Why?

   explain the two narratives (stories) about Hiroshima:

a.Victimization: The japanese look back on the horrific time when they were bombed in regret and morning. Many people unnecessarily lost their lives just because they were civilians living in that city. b.Triumph: America sees bombing the cities as a necessary sacrifice in order to end the war. They believe that if they hadn’t done that, the war would have gone on for much song, thus killing thousands more civilians and soldiers alike.2.Which narrative do you agree with more? Why?.I agree with the victimization narrative more because, just like the rest of this war,the bombs purpose was to kill the civilians, I don’t believe in just disregarding innocent human life as collateral damage just because a country won’t stop fighting

Explanation:

Hiroshima as victimization:Japan was doing nothing but defending itself and the relentless attacksput upon them by their enemy were totally uncalled for. Japan was not even given enough time to formulate a response to one attack before they were attacked again.Hiroshima as triumph:The Japanese had planned to annihilate the US and we were able to annihilate them before they could do anymore damage to the US. We had nochoice to do what we did because surrender would never have been allowed.

thats all i could do sorry

the correct answer is: (1) affected by gerrymandering; (2) not affected by gerrymandering.

gerrymandering is known as a practice that intends to establish a some kind of political advantage for a particular party or group. to do this district boundaries are manipulated. the new resulting district is named a gerrymandering.

in other words, what gerrymandering does is to draw the boundaries of electoral districts trying to benefit the party who is doing it. sometimes, the party controlling the legislature will redraw it so they can maximize the number of districts they are likely to control.