Analyze the excerpt from Lincoln’s speech by answering the following questions in one paragraph: What is Lincoln’s point of view regarding the future of the country?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Lincoln’s point of view.
What is an historical idea or event that supports Lincoln’s point of view?

Analyze the excerpt from Douglas’s speech by answering the following questions in one paragraph:

What is Douglas’s point of view regarding the Constitution?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Douglas’s point of view.
What is an historical idea or event that supports Douglas’s point of view?

yo sorry my acc was deleted for no reason and I need get points

Explanation:

He didn't want to see his country!

Explanation: He does not want see the country be gone but he expects all division between America to be gone. Lincoln wants to see this his country as undivided and free from slavery. “I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half- free”. He saying that the only way to ‘endure and survive is that everyone has to be free and there are no opposing sides. When the 13thAmendment of the Constitution was ratified and slavery was abolished. Now, America has survived.  

b. used to hunting for their food.

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: